Mark Lajal vs Jack Gibbens Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Lajal vs J. Gibbens

Mark Lajal
EST
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
w
l
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
22
Age
28
-
Height
-
148
C. Rank
0
145
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$129.4K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Jack Gibbens
GBR
l
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
22
Age
28
-
Height
-
148
C. Rank
0
145
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$129.4K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Lajal 1 - 0 Gibbens
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mark Lajal winning 2 and Jack Gibbens winning 0. The last match between Mark Lajal and Jack Gibbens was at the M25 Sheffield, 04-10-2022, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Mark Lajal getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lajal | 1 |
| Gibbens | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Sheffield(10-04-22)
Mark Lajal
6
6
Jack Gibbens
3
2
M. Lajal vs J. Gibbens H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $129,380 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 61.15% (181-115) | Career Total W/L | 43.11% (72-95) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 5 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 33.33% (1-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Lajal vs J. Gibbens Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mark Lajal has won 46.35% of points on their second serve, while Jack Gibbens has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mark Lajal, in recent form, has won 48.11% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jack Gibbens has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.26% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mark Lajal has saved 57.06% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jack Gibbens has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mark Lajal has won 64.79% of matches played (W/L 46/25), with Jack Gibbens winning 0% (W/L 0/2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mark Lajal has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 103/56), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 13/17). Jack Gibbens has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 52/58), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/4).
- Player level: In the last year, Mark Lajal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.63% of matches (W/L 35/16), where as Jack Gibbens has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0.00% of matches (W/L 0/2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mark Lajal winning 1 times and Jack Gibbens being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mark Lajal winning 2 and Jack Gibbens winning 0.
- The last match between Mark Lajal and Jack Gibbens was at the M25 Sheffield, 04-10-2022, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Mark Lajal getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:59:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mark Lajal has played against opponents with an average rank of 224.06 while Jack Gibbens has played against players with an average rank of 133.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mark Lajal has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jack Gibbens has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mark Lajal has converted 34.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jack Gibbens has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Mark Lajal vs Jack Gibbens Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Lajal vs J. Gibbens H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 14 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 0:59:0 | Average Match Time | 0:59:0 |
| 73% (30/41) | 1st Serve % | 75% (38/51) |
| 90% (27/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (25/38) |
| 55% (6/11) | 2nd Serve Win % | 15% (2/13) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
| 47% (24/51) | Return Points Win % | 20% (8/41) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Lajal 51%, Gibbens 56%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Lajal 51%, Gibbens 39%.
Break Points Saved %: Lajal 63%, Gibbens 67%.
M. Lajal Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | w/o | ||
R1 | W | 5-7 7-5 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(1) 7-5 | ||
J. Gibbens Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-1 7-6(6) | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-4 4-6 10-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-7(5) 7-6(4) 12-10 | ||

M. Lajal vs J. Gibbens Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.15% (181/115) | YTD Win/Loss | 43.11% (72/95) |
| 59.77% (422/284) | Sets Win/Loss | 43.32% (159/208) |
| 53.59% (3628/3142) | Games Win/Loss | 47.17% (1691/1894) |
| 64.78% (103/56) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.27% (52/58) |
| 43.33% (13/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 38.10% (8/13) |
| 60.44% (55/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37.50% (12/20) |
| 62.50% (10/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 0.45 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 1482 | Aces Total | 184 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 978 | Total Double Faults | 171 |
| 1:44:40 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 362.08 | Average Opponent Rank | 270.63 |
| 63% (13304/20965) | 1st Serve % | 65% (2962/4545) |
| 72% (9518/13304) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (1910/2962) |
| 50% (3836/7667) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (729/1583) |
| 41% (871/2102) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (122/304) |
| 40% (8426/21173) | Return Points Win % | 34% (1460/4253) |
| 42.86% (6/8) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57.14% (8/6) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61.58% (109/68) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 65.88% (56/29) | Futures W/L | 43.11% (72/95) |
| 61% (177/290) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 42% (68/163) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (57/102) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (17/34) |
| 47% (53/112) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (18/37) |
| 84% (175/147) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (67/58) |
| 16% (175/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (67/9) |
| 29% (121/35) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (100/14) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sun, 21 Dec, 06:30 PM
PredictionSun, 21 Dec, 10:00 AM
PredictionSun, 21 Dec, 08:00 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

20 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Tien Vs Basavareddy H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

20 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Blockx Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Tien Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Landaluce Vs Jodar H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Blockx Vs Prizmic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Engel H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?
Top Predictions Today
Learner Tien
Alexander Blockx
Sohyun Park
Ksenia Efremova
Soha Sadiq
Chandana PotugariSee All Today’s Tennis Predictions
20:00
H2H 0-0
08:35
H2H 0-0
H2H 0-0